Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Nov. 11, 2021

Judge Nathan order on redactions in US v. Maxwell, Nov. 11, 2021

Judge Alison Nathan orders parties in the Ghislaine Maxwell case to file proposed redactions and sealed exhibits on the public docket by November 12, 2021.Machine-written summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America,

—v—

Ghislaine Maxwell,

Defendant.

20-CR-330 (AJN)

ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ proposed redactions in accordance with Dkt. No. 401. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995).

The parties are hereby ORDERED to file the proposed redactions and accompanying exhibits on the public docket on or before November 12, 2021.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 11, 2021 New York, New York A

ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Judge Nathan order on redactions in US v. Maxwell, Nov. 11, 2021

Court filings

Judge Alison Nathan orders parties in the Ghislaine Maxwell case to file proposed redactions and sealed exhibits on the public docket by November 12, 2021.

Court Records: United States v. Maxwell (S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cr-00330) · Nov. 11, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions in accordance with Dkt. No. 401. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witness…