Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · May 6, 2021

SDNY letter to the trial judge on defense subpoena for photographs, May 2021

Prosecutors' letter to the presiding judge supplementing the government's response to the defendant's subpoena to her attorneys' firm, explaining which photographs will be made available for inspection and why remaining requests should be denied.Machine-written summary

Document EFTA 02831943

United States Attorney Southern District of New York

The Silvio! Mono Building One Saint Andrew’s Plaza New York New York 10007

May 6, 2021

BY ECF

The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Dear Judge Nathan:

The Government respectfully submits this letter to supplement its letter of May 4, 2021 (Did. No. 269) regarding Requests 9 through 11 of the defendant’s requested subpoena to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.

As noted in the Government’s letter, the Government has produced to the defense copies of the photographs sought in Request II. (Dkt. No. 269 at 8). The Government has now determined that, for a subset of the photographs requested by the defendant, the Government previously provided the defense with scanned images of this subset of photographs from the FBI Florida file. The original photographs are currently in the FBI’s possession. Accordingly, because some of the original photographs are currently in the Prosecution Team’s possession, the Government will make them available to the defendant for inspection upon request. Request 11 is thercibre moot as to those photographs.

As to the remaining photographs that are outside the Government’s possession, because the defendant has copies of those photographs, the originals are not a proper subject of a Rule 17 subpoena. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Government’s letter, Request II should otherwise be denied.

Respectfully submitted,

AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney

By: s/ Maurene Comey / Alison Moe Lam Pomerantz / Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York

Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF)

SDNY letter to the trial judge on defense subpoena for photographs, May 2021

Court filings

Prosecutors' letter to the presiding judge supplementing the government's response to the defendant's subpoena to her attorneys' firm, explaining which photographs will be made available for inspection and why remaining requests should be denied.

Court Records: United States v. Maxwell (S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cr-00330) · May 6, 2021

Document EFTA 02831943 United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio! Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York New York 10007 May 6, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to supplement its letter of May 4, 2021 (Did. No. 269) regarding Requests 9 through 11 of the defendant's requested subpoena to Boies Schiller Flexner…