Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · April 23, 2021

Government letter to Judge Alison Nathan requesting redactions in Maxwell case

SDNY prosecutors seek narrowly tailored redactions of third-party names in filings about the defense's Rule 17(c) subpoena in Maxwell's case.Machine-written summary

Document EFTA 02831799

United States Attorney Southern District of New York

The Mollo Building One Saint Andrew’s Plaza New York. New York 10007

April 23, 2021

BY ECF

The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Dear Judge Nathan:

The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court’s Order dated April 21, 2021, which directed the Government to submit any requests for redaction of information contained in filings regarding the defense’s proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena. (Dkt. No. 226). After reviewing the relevant filings, the Government seeks a limited number of redactions, which are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of third parties. In particular, the Government respectfully requests that the Court permit the redaction of the names and identifying information of particular third parties referenced in the defense’s response to the objections of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (“BSF’) to the defense’s proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, BSF’s reply, and the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the redactions to those same documents. Today the Government is submitting to the Court by email its proposed redactions to those documents, which the Government respectfully requests be filed under seal.

These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although these documents are judicial documents that are subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of third parties referenced in the documents. These redactions are thus consistent with similar, tailored redactions permitted by the Court in this case to protect the privacy interests of third parties. Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.

The Government has conferred with defense counsel and counsel from BSF, both of whom indicated that they take no position on the Government’s redaction requests.

Respectfully submitted,

AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney

By: Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lam Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York

212-637-2324

Cc: All Counsel of Record (By ECF)

Government letter to Judge Alison Nathan requesting redactions in Maxwell case

Court filings

SDNY prosecutors seek narrowly tailored redactions of third-party names in filings about the defense's Rule 17(c) subpoena in Maxwell's case.

Court Records: United States v. Maxwell (S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cr-00330) · April 23, 2021

Document EFTA 02831799 United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 April 23, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated April 21, 2021, which directed the Government to submit any requests for redaction of information contained in fil…