Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Oct. 31, 2022

Court filing, 2022-10-31

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014681-AG Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida,

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING THE AM A1SeAC) T TSMN FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES UNDER FLO TU °TE SECTION 57.105

CO SA

THIS CAUSE having come before \ urt September 6 and 8, 2022 on State Attorney Dave Aronberg’s November 9, 2020 otion for Attorneys’ Fees Under Florida Statutes Section 57.105, and the Court h g wed the Amended Motion, the evidence presented, and arguments of counsel, and being d rwise fully and duly advised in the premises, it is hereby,

ORDERED D UDGED as follows:

  • I. e 7 Itorney Dave Aronberg’s November 9, 2020 Amended Motion for Attorneys DENIED.
    1. Under Florida Statutes Section 57.105, a court may award reasonable attorneys’ fees only if “the court finds that the losing party or the losing party’s attorney knew or should have known that a claim or defense when initially presented to the court or at any time before trial:
  • (a) Was not supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claim or defense; or der Florida Statutes Section 57.105 (the “Amended Motion”) is hereby

(b) Would not be supported by the application of then-existing law to those material facts.” Fla. Stat. § 57.105(1).

  1. The Court heard the testimony of the parties and finds the testimony of Mr. Aronberg reliable and credible, and resolves the conflicts in the testimony in favor of Mr. Aronberg; however, the “Amended Motion” is the only motion for fees that was set for hearing, and for reasons stated below Mr. Aronberg’s motion is denied - solely on procedut7t punds.

  2. The Amended Motion did not comply with the strict “safe h ice provision of section 57.105(4), which requires the motion to be served on the n- party at least 21 days before it is filed.

  3. The Court must deny the Amended Motio /Liberty Express, Inc., 252 So. 3d at 403 (“[1]n order to have properly complied wi ti’c, 7.105, [the filing party] must have first served the proposed motion upon the p ;s Si e t to sanction”: “The primary purpose of section 57.105’s safe harbor provision is row the recipient of the motion with notice and the opportunity to withdraw or abando *v s claim before sanctions are sought.”).

  4. Accordingly, th 020 Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is DENIED.

DONE AND O in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida

O ?Si

502019CAOI4681XXXXM8 Oli31 202 Lads Delgado Ora Jae

cc: All counsel of record

Court filing, 2022-10-31

Court filings

Court Records: CA Florida Holdings v. Aronberg (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 50-2019-CA-014681) · Oct. 31, 2022

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA-014681-AG Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST, Plaintiff, v. DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendants. ORDER DENYING THE AM A1SeAC) T TSMN FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER FLO TU °TE SECTION 57.105 CO SA THIS CAUSE having come before \ urt September 6 and 8, 2022 on State Attorney Dave Aronberg's November 9, 2020 otion for Attorneys' Fees Under Florida Statutes …