## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. , individually, and L.M., individually,
Defendant,
## MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CO P L D COVERY RESPONSES FROM
Counter-Plaintiff J. ), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380 of the Floridntules Of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court to enter an order Denying the Coun ant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, and in s ereof states as follows:
# INTRODUCTION
Counter- dant's recently filed motion represents nothing more than a delayed effort to obfusca inent pending issues in this case in hopes of further delaying the rapidly approac al date. As noted in Counter-Defendant's motion, this Court entered Orders relevant to the underlying discovery more than five years ago - on April 10, 2012, May 7, 2012, and August 17, 2012. Conveniently excluded from Epstein's Motion is timely compliance with the direction of the Court. In fact, on August 3, 2012, this Court held a hearing regarding outstanding discovery. On August 7, 2012—after that hearing filed his
Second Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request to Produce Pursuant to Court Order incorporating all responsive documents produced on May 8, 2012 in response to the Court's May 7, 2012 Order, and further asserting that "Mlle documents contained within Composite Exhibit A and those documents listed on the privilege log attached as Composite Exhibit together comprise the complete universe of responsive documents within possession, custody and control." See August 7, 2012 Motion attached hereto as Exhibit A. On August 9, 2012, communications between and agents of the federal August 7 correspondence, but had been previously pr publically accessible. informed Epstein by way of letter correspondence that the non-electronic '41-7 ent were not included in the pstein and were additionally
On August 17, 2012, the Court entered an 'Cc \\ responsive to the August 3, 2012 hearing wherein the Court required Counter-Plaintiff to produce non-privileged responsive documents and identify privileged responsive docuinerits in a proper privilege log. By the time the Court entered this Order had already m lied with the Court's direction based upon the discussion that occurred during the August,3 hearing. Despite Epstein's deliberate intention to mislead the Court regarding the statdcof discovery conducted over five years ago, the record is clear that fully comp etwitl ithe most recent relevant Order on this issue back in 2012. See Exhibit A and Exhibit a,
# MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Under Florida law "trial courts are imbued with broad discretion in discovery matters." National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Embrey, 375 So.2d 358, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Although Courts are to give liberal construction to the rules of discove and Courts have broad discretion in discovery matters, such discretion is limited and must erc within the permissible scope of discovery as set forth in the rules. See Nat'l Co ,.'c ?'Stores, Inc. v. Embrey, 375 So. 2d 358, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). "Parties may ob in discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matt e pending action" or if the information sought appears reasonably calculated the discovery of admissible evidence. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(6)(1). Pursuant le .280(5), "[w]hen a party withholds information otherwise discoverable under th protection as trial preparation material e shall make the claim expressly and shall describe the nature of the documents, Gomm iicaC oons, or things not produced or disclosed in a manner that, without revealing informat ritself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the applicability of the pthoiregt or protection." Furthermore, Rule 1.280 does not provide a time limit for the filing' privilege log. Allstate Indem. Co. v. Oser, 893 So.2d 675, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 200 y claiming that it is privileged or subject to
Iii\\this case, either already made production or objected on a timely basis to requests, and provided a detailed privilege log in accordance with the Court's August 17, 2012 Order. There can be no doubt that did not waive any privilege, but rather filed timely objections and asserted his claims of privilege in accordance with Rule 1.280. Furthermore, as noted above, all documents within possession, custody, or control were either produced
[REDACTED] adv. Epstein\
2009CA040800XXXXMB\
Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery\
Responses from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
or identified by way of his properly asserted privilege log. Consequently, contrary to Epstein's Motion, [REDACTED] has already fully responded to Epstein's requests.
### CONCLUSION
Wherefore, Counter-Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court deny Jeffrey Epstein's five-year delayed Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] as the requested relief is moot as [REDACTED] has already fulfilled his discovery obligations.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 28th day of Sept., 2017.
JACK SCAROLA\
Florida Bar No.: 169440\
Attorney E-Mail(s): [jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com); and\
[mmccann@searcylaw.com](mailto:mmccann@searcylaw.com)\
Primary E-Mail: [scarolateam@searcylaw.com](mailto:scarolateam@searcylaw.com)\
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.\
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard\
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409\
Phone: (561) 686-6300\
Fax: 561-383-9451\
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] adv. Epstein\
2009CA040800XXXXMB\
Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Discovery\
Responses from [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
### COUNSEL LIST
William Chester [REDACTED], Esquire\
wcblaw@aol.com; wcblawasst@gmail.com\
250 S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400\
West Palm Beach, FL 33401\
Phone: (561)-655-4777\
Fax: (561)-835-8691\
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire\
jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com\
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.\
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400\
West Palm Beach, FL 33401\
Phone: (561)-659-8300\
Fax: (561)-835-8691\
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Nichole J. Segal, Esquire\
njs@FLAppellateLaw.com; kbt@FLAppellateLaw.com\
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.\
444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350\
West Palm Beach, FL 33401\
Phone: (561)-721-0400\
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. Edwards
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire\
staff.efile@pathtojustice.com\
[REDACTED] Jaffe Weissing [REDACTED] Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.\
425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954)-524-2820\
Fax: (954)-524-2822
Fred Haddad, Esquire\
Dee@FredHaddadLaw.com; Fred@FredHaddadLaw.com\
Fred Haddad, P.A.\
One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394\
Phone: (954)-467-6767\
Fax: (954)-467-3599\
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
adv. Epstein 2009CA040800XXXXMB Memorandum inigtion.lein's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from J.
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)467-1223 Fax: (954)-337-3716
Attorneys 4414sc for Jeffrey Epstein Attorneys for Scott Rothstein IS9
Marc S. Nurik, Esquire marc@nuriklaw.com One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556
#### IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, J. individually, and L.M., individually,
Defendant,
A
#### SECOND SUPPLEMENTAIALESPOASE TO EPSTEIN'S REOUEST TO PRODUCE t STII#NT 14/ TO COURT ORDER
Defendant/Counterplaintiff, BRADLE ( . tr, RDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this Second Suppleme Res S nse to EPSTEIN'S Request to Produce in compliance with this Court's Orde S as follows:
- I. Copies of materials revt roduced to counsel for EPSTEIN on May 8, 2012 are attached as C torite Exhibit A. Some of the produced documents contain privilege redacti s as no u tion was culled by electronic search of approximately 28,000 documents ased to by the RRA Bankruptcy Trustee. documents contained within Composite Exhibit A and those documents listed on the privilege log attached as Composite Exhibit B, together comprise the complete universe of responsive documents within possession, custody and control.
A Cos
adv. Epstein
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request to Produce Pursuant to Court Order
Page 2 of 3
- 4. IIIME reaffirms the accuracy of IIMM Supplemental Response to Request to Produce previously filed on June 8, 2012 and attached as Exhibit C.
- 5. employment with RRA commenced in approximately A of 2009, and he has retained no electronic communications from prior to that
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregpM 0 en furnished by Electronic and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this r of August, 2012.
JACK SC
Florida 40
Searc la Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+6s
Lakes Boulevard
ch, Florida 33409
) 686-6300
561. 383-9451
eys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff,
adv. Epstein
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request to Produce Pursuant to Court Order
Page 3 o(3
## COUNSEL LIST
Esquire Jaffe, Weissing, Fistos &
Lehrman, FL
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 524-2820
Fax: (954) 524-2822 CO N
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
Phone: (561) 659-8300 "S C)
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Fax: (561) 835-8691
Marc S. Nurik, Esquire
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 745-5849
Fax: (954) 745-3556
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esqui
524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 333
Phone: (954) 467-1 3
Fax: (954) 337-3
Lilly Ann S Esquire
The L-S
Atto effrey Epstein
1441 Bric I Avenue, 15th Floor
Miami, FL 33131
Phone: (305) 503-5503
Fax: (305) 503-6801
NOTA CORRIDORED COPY
Docs
Responsive
\~~to~~ ORDER
EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN
5-07-2012
EXHIBIT A\
1 of 164
## BRAD - PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010
| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION |
| -------------- | --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| ...Emails01 | 05/22/2010
9:53am | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails01 | 05/22/2010
9:10am | Conchita
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails01-02 | 05/22/2010
8:47am | [REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails02 | 05/21/2010
12:44pm | [REDACTED] | Conchita
Sarnoff | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails03 | 6/2/2010
11:50 am | [REDACTED];
Spencer
Kuvin; Mike
Fisten | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails03 | 6/2/2010
10:49 am | Conchita
[REDACTED];
Spencer
Kuvin; Mike
Fisten | [REDACTED] | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product |
## BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010
| # | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION |
| -------------- | -------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | | | | | privilege |
| ...Emails03-04 | 6/2/2010
10:42 am | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED]
Spencer Kuvin;
Mike Fisten | Epstein moving assets and sex trafficking | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails05 | 6/7/2010
8:01pm | Brad
[REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Investigation of other potential witnesses. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
11:30am | Brad
[REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
10:13am | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Brad Edwards | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
9:52am | Brad
[REDACTED] | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails06 | 6/8/2010
9:27am | Conchita
[REDACTED] | Brad
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product |
#### BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010
| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION |
| ----------- | -------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | | | | | privilege |
| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
9:27am | Brad
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
8:55am | [REDACTED] | Brad
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
8:40am | Brad
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails07 | 6/8/2010
8:26am | [REDACTED] | Brad Edwards | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails08 | 6/8/2010
8:10am | Brad
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails08 | 6/7/2010
21:57 am | [REDACTED] | Brad
[REDACTED] | Location of Witnesses | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product |
# BRAD — PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010
| DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION I | OBJECTION | | |
| ------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------- | ------------ |
| .Emails08 6/7/2010 Brad Location of | Irrelevant | not | reasonably |
| 8:24am Witnesses | calculated | to | lead to the |
| | discovery | of | admissible |
| | evidence | and | outside the |
| time | frame | of | Plaintiffs |
| | complai | | Work product |
| privil | e | | |
| .Emails08 6/7/2010 Conchita Brad Location of In: | ant | of | reasonably |
| 20:06 Witnesses | ted | to | lead to the |
| dEL | y | of | admissible |
| | ence | and | outside the |
| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's |
| | complaint | Work | product |
| .Emails08 -9 6/7/2010 Brad Conchita Lo 'o of | Irrelevant | not | reasonably |
| 7:57Pm | calculated | to | lead to the |
| | discovery | of | admissible |
| | evidence | and | outside the |
| time | frame | or | Plaintiffs |
| | complaint | Work | product |
| .Emails010 6/15/2010 Brad Maritza Vazquez — | Irrelevant | not | reasonably |
| 64 ;:i ‘ ) C | | | |
| Witness | calculated | to | lead to the |
| | discovery | of | admissible |
| | evidence | and | outside the |
| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's |
| | complaint | Work | product |
| .Emails011 6/16/2010 Bra Conchita Information re: | Irrelevant | not | reasonably |
| 1 :10po | | | |
| Kuvin; Peter | | | |
| child sex | | | |
| | calculated | to lead | to the |
| | discovery | of | admissible |
| | evidence and | | outside the |
| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's |
| | complaint | Work | product |
| .Emaiis012 6/17/2010 Brad Conchita Information re: Irrelevant | | not | reasonably |
| 11 :37am child sex | | | |
| trafficking and | | | |
| calculated | | to lead | to the |
| discovery | | of | admissible |
| investigation and | | | |
| preparation for | | | |
| evidence | and | | outside the |
| time | frame | of | Plaintiff's |
| complaint | | Work | product |
# BRAD MN PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010
| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION |
| -------------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | | | | | privilege |
| ...Emails012 | 6/17/2010
11:19am | [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege |
| ...Emails012 | 6/17/2010
11:16am | Brad [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege |
| ...Emails012 | 6/17/2010
10:53am | Conchita [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege |
| ...Emails012-
013 | 6/17/2010
10:33am | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita
Sarnoff | Information re:
child sex
trafficking and
investigation and
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege |
| ...Emails014 | 6/30/2010
11:22am | Brad [REDACTED];
Mike Fisten | Conchita [REDACTED] | Location of
witnesses in
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product
privilege |
| ...Emails015 | 7/5/2010
2:27pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita [REDACTED] | Location of
witnesses in
preparation for
trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably
calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible
evidence and outside the
time frame of Plaintiff's
complaint. Work product |
## BRAD PRIVILEGE LOG EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010
| | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION |
| ---------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- | ------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | | | | | privilege |
| ...Emails015 | 7/5/2010
14:08 | [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails015-016 | 7/5/2010
2:03pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita [REDACTED] | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails016 | 7/5/2010
13:35 | Conchita [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails016 | 7/5/2010
1:30pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita Sarnoff | Location of witnesses in preparation for trial. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails017 | 7/9/2010
3:16pm | Brad [REDACTED] | Conchita [REDACTED] | Conclusion of case. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
| ...Emails017 | 7/9/2010
13:44 | Conchita [REDACTED] | Brad [REDACTED] | Conclusion of case. | Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product |
**BRAD [REDACTED] - PRIVILEGE LOG**\
**EMAILS DATED NOVEMBER 2009 TO AUGUST 2010**
| [REDACTED] | DATE | TO | FROM | DESCRIPTION | OBJECTION |
| ----------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| ...Emails017 | 7/9/2010
1:36pm | Brad
[REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | Conclusion of case. | privilege
Irrelevant- not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and outside the time frame of Plaintiff's complaint. Work product privilege |
NOTA CERTIFIED COPY
WEST PALM REACH OFFICE
2109 PALM REACH LAKES BLVD\
WEST PALM REACH FLORIDA 33409
PO BOX 762\
WEST PALM REACH FLORIDA 33402
(561) 886-6300\
1-800-760-8607\
1-800-220-7006 Spanish
SEARCY\
DENNEY\
SCAROLA\
BARNHART\
& SHIPLEY, P.A.
ITALIAHASSEE OFFICE
THE TOWLE HOUSE\
SIX NORTH CALHOUN STREET\
TALLAHASSEE, FL 32001-0011
(850) 224-1600\
1-868-549-7011
VIA EMAIL and U.S. MAIL\
tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com
June 08, 2012
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire\
Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A.\
524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Re: [REDACTED] adv. Epstein\
Our File No.: 291874
Dear Ms. Coleman:
Attached is our Supplemental Response to Request to Produce as that request was modified by Court Order of April 10, 2012. Upon receipt and review of this attachment, please inform us whether you intend to proceed with Monday's hearing.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW\
ROSALYN SMITH KAREN-BARNES\
\* GREGORY BARNHART\
T HARDEE [REDACTED] H\
LAURIE J BRIGGS\
BRIAN R DENNEY\
BRENDA S. FULNER\
MARIAND [REDACTED]\
JAMES W. GUSTAFSON, JR.\
JACK P [REDACTED]\
DAVID K. KELLEY, JR.\
CAMERON M. KENNEDY\
[REDACTED]\
DARRYL L [REDACTED]\
\*WILLIAM A. NORTON\
[REDACTED] E CURLAN\
EDWARD V. RICCI\
\*JOHN SCAROLA\
\*CHRISTIAN D. SEARCY\
\*JOHN A. SHIPLEY H\
[REDACTED] K. SPEED H\
BRIAN P. [REDACTED] H\
KAREN E. TERRY\
DONALD J. [REDACTED] H\
\*C. CALVIN WARRINER H
OE COUNSEL\
\*EARL L. DENNEY, JR.5
SHAREHOLDERS\
\*BOARD CERTIFIED
ALSO ADVISED\
\*KENTUCKY\
\* MARIE\
\* MARYLAND\
\* MASSACHUSETTS\
\* MISSISSIPPI\
\* NEW HAMPSHIRE\
\* NEW JERSEY\
\* VIRGINIA\
\* WASHINGTON DC
FARALEGALS\
OWAN AVANTEURER\
HARRY M. DUFRESNE\
DAVID W. GRAMME\
JOHN C. HOPKINS\
DEBORAH M. KHARP\
WINGENT L. SEOMART, MF\
JAMES PETER LIVE\
ROBERT W. PATCHER\
MARK P. PONCY\
KATHREDA SANCH\
STEVE M. SAVIN\
BORNE S. STARR\
WALTER A. STEIN
Sincerely,\
JACK SCAROLA\
JS/men\
Esq.\
Rec: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esq.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE\
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND\
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
Plaintiff(s).
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,\
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and\
L.M., individually,
Defendant(s).
[REDACTED] SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE
Defendant/Counterplaintiff, [REDACTED] J. Edwards, by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this supplemental response to the following request of Epstein:
All emails, data, correspondence, and similar documents dated April 1, 2008 through August 1, 2010 by and between [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Scott W. Rothstein, Marc Nurik, Cara Holmes, Mike Fisten, and any one of the following regarding or mentioning Jeffrey Epstein in any way; (a) the U.S. Attorney's Office, (b) the State Attorney's Office, (c) the Federal Bureau of Investigation, (d) Conchita Sarnoff, and (e) any other news employees or reporters.
Supplemental Response:
Except as previously delivered to Epstein's counsel or specifically identified on the previously delivered privilege log, no additional documents responsive to Epstein's request are in [REDACTED] [REDACTED] possession, custody or control.
Edwards adv. Epstein\
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG\
Edwards' Supplemental Response to Request to Produce
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by\
Electronic and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this 8th day of June, 2012
Jack Scarola
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 382-9451
Attorney for Bradley J. [REDACTED]
Edwards adv. Epstein\
Case No.: 502009CA040806XXXXMBAG\
[REDACTED] Supplemental Response to Request to Produce
COUNSEL LIST
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] Esquire\
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED] Fistos &\
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954) 524-2820\
Fax: (954) 524-2822
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire\
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.\
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400\
West Palm Beach, FL 33401\
Phone: (561) 659-8300\
Fax: (561) 835-8691
Marc S. Nurik, Esquire\
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik\
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954) 745-5849\
Fax: (954) 745-3556
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire\
Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A.\
524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954) 467-1223\
Fax: (954) 337-3716
Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esquire\
The L.S. Law Firm\
1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor\
Miami, FL 33131\
Phone: (305) 503-5503\
Fax: (305) 503-6801
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE\
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND\
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,\
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], individually, and\
L.M., individually,
Defendant,
ADDENDUM TO SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY ORDER
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], through counsel, files this Addendum to the previously filed Supplemental Response to this Court's Order in response to [REDACTED]' Motion for Clarification.
See attached letter
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by Electronic and U.S. Mail to all counsel on the attached list, this 9th day of August, 2012.
JACK SCAROLA\
Florida Bar No.: 169440\
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.\
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard\
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409\
Phone: (561) 686-6300\
Fax: (561) 383-9451\
Attorneys for [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] adv. Epstein\
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG\
Addendum to Supplemental Response to Discovery Order\
Page 2 of 2
**COUNSEL LIST**
[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire\
[REDACTED], Jaffe, Weissing, [REDACTED], Fistos &\
Lehrman, FL\
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954) 524-2820\
Fax: (954) 524-2822
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire\
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.\
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400\
West Palm Beach, FL 33401\
Phone: (561) 659-8300\
Fax: (561) 835-8691
Marc S. Nurik, Esquire\
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954) 745-5849\
Fax: (954) 745-3556
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire\
524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301\
Phone: (954) 467-1223\
Fax: (954) 337-3716
Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esquire\
The L-S Law Firm\
Attorney For Jeffrey Epstein\
1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor\
Miami, FL 33131\
Phone: (305) 503-5503\
Fax: (305) 503-6801
SEARCY\
DENNEY\
SCAROLA\
BARNHART\
& SHIPLEY, PA
*Allernees\
at Law*
WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE:
2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD\
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409
P.O. BOX 3626\
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
(561) 686-6300\
1-800-780-8607\
1-800-220-7006 Spanish
TALLAHASSEE OFFICE:
THE TOWLE HOUSE\
517 NORTH CALHOUN STREET\
TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-1231
(850) 224-7600\
1-888-549-7011
VIA EMAIL and U.S. MAIL\
tonja@tonjahaddadpa.com
August 09, 2012
ATTORNEYS AT LAW:
ROSALYN SIA BAKER-BARNES\
\*F. GREGORY BARNHART\
T. HARDEE BASS, III\
LAURIE J. BRIGGS\
BRIAN R. DENNEY\
BRENDA S. FULMER\
MARIANO [REDACTED]\
JAMES W. GUSTAFSON, JR.\
JACK P. [REDACTED]\
DAVID K. KELLEY, JR.\
CAMERON M. KENNEDY\
WILLIAM B. [REDACTED]\
DARRYL L. [REDACTED]\
\*WILLIAM A. NORTON\
[REDACTED] E. QUINLAN2\
EDWARD V. RICCI\
\*JOHN SCAROLA\
\*CHRISTIAN D. SEARCY\
\*JOHN A. SHIPLEY III\
[REDACTED] K. SPEED III\
BRIAN P. [REDACTED] I4\
KAREN E. TERRY\
DONALD J. [REDACTED] III\
\*C. CALVIN WARRINER III
DE COUNSEL\
\*EARL L. DENNEY, JR.5
SHAREHOLDERS\
\*BOARD CERTIFIED
ALSO ADMITTED\
1KENTUCKY\
2MAINE\
3MARYLAND\
4MASSACHUSETTS\
5MESSISSIPPI\
6NEW HAMPSHIRE\
7NEW JERSEY\
8VIRGINIA\
9WASHINGTON DC
PARALEGALS\
VIVIAN AYAN-TEJEDA\
RANDY M. DUFRESNE\
DAVID W. GILMORE\
JOHN C. [REDACTED]\
DESORAH M. KNAPP\
VINCENT L. LEONARD, JR.\
JAMES PETER LOVE\
ROBERT W. PITCHER\
MARK P. POINCY\
KATHLEEN [REDACTED]\
STEVE M. [REDACTED]\
BONNIE S. STARK\
WALTER A. [REDACTED]
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire\
Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A.\
524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N\
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Re: [REDACTED] adv. Epstein\
Our File No.: 291874
Dear Ms. Haddad-Coleman:
It has just been brought to my attention that our prior Paragraph 13 production and privilege log were limited to electronically stored email communications. Neither the production nor the privilege log included the non-electronic communications between [REDACTED] and agents of the federal government. However, those letters and pleadings have all previously been provided to Mr. Epstein and his counsel through public filings in the Crime Victims' Rights Act proceedings in federal court. In that they remain equally accessible to you now, it is not our intention to separately produce these documents.
Sincerely,
JACK SCAROLA\
JS/mep
cc: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], Esquire
