# In Re Operation Leap Year Key Correspondence Volume 1 of 2
(Through Signing of Non-Prosecution Agreement)

INDEX

<table><thead><tr><th>Tab</th><th>Date &amp; Time</th><th>From</th><th>To</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>11/16/06</td><td rowspan="8"></td><td>Sanchez</td><td>Letter requesting documents in accordance with agreement with Guy Lewis</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1/8/07</td><td>Sanchez</td><td>Letter requesting documents</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1/17/07</td><td>Sanchez</td><td>Letter requesting documents</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>5/15/07</td><td>Goldberger</td><td rowspan="3"></td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>5/24/07</td><td>Lefcourt</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>6/6/07</td><td>Targ</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>6/18/07</td><td>Lefcourt</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>7/1/07</td><td>Sanchez Lefcourt</td><td>E-mail re outstanding subpoenas and planned meeting for 7/11/07</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>7/6/07</td><td>Lefcourt</td><td></td><td>Letter analyzing inapplicability of 18 USC § 2422(b)</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>7/16/07</td><td></td><td>Black</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>7/26/07</td><td>U.S. Attorney’s Office</td><td>Defense</td><td>Summary of terms of non-prosecution agreement and calculation of guideline range</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>8/16/07</td><td rowspan="3"></td><td>Lefcourt</td><td>Letter regarding NES subpoenas</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>9/6/07 5:47 pm</td><td></td><td>E-mail summarizing status of negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>9/10/07 5:23 pm</td><td>Lefcourt</td><td>E-mail attaching first proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement</td></tr></tbody></table>

EFTA00190101

<table border="1"><tr><td>15</td><td>9/11/07
12:05 pm</td><td></td><td></td><td>E-mail containing Acosta edits to Non-Prosecution Agreement</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>9/11/07
2:15 pm</td><td rowspan="3"></td><td>Lefcourt</td><td>E-mail forwarding revised agreement containing Acosta eduts</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>9/12/07
3:44 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail rejecting offer to have Epstein plead to assault in the maritime jurisdiction of the US</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>9/12/07
4:20 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail rejecting offer to have Epstein plead to assault in the maritime jurisdiction of the US [sent to alternate Lefkowitz e-mail address]</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>9/12/07
5:55 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>Responding to rejection and thanking office for meeting</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>9/13/07
6:58 pm</td><td></td><td>Acosta SL</td><td>E-mail updating status of negotiations and discussing other potential federal charges</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>9/13/07
7:27 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail scheduling conference call and mentioning other possible federal charges</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>9/13/07
7:35 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail confirming conference call and stating that he is considering same charges</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td>9/14/07
9:25 am</td><td></td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail summarizing conference call with Lefkowitz - agreement to plead to an Information charging 1 count of obstruction and 1 count of simple assault.</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>9/14/07
9:40 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail asking to revise the Information to charge 1 count of 403 instead of 1512 and requesting a factual proffer.</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>9/14/07
9:54 am</td><td rowspan="2"></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail containing draft plea agreement and Information.</td></tr><tr><td>26</td><td>9/14/07
9:56 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail regarding proposed changes from Lefkowitz.</td></tr><tr><td>27</td><td>9/14/07
1:02 pm</td><td>(AUSA-Alaska)</td><td></td><td>Response to my e-mail enclosing trust agreement and supporting documentation.</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td>9/17/07
9:43 am</td><td rowspan="3"></td><td>Black
Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail informing them of removal of hearing on motion to quash from Judge Marra&#x27;s calendar.</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td>9/17/07
10:35 am</td><td></td><td>E-mail summarizing status of plea negotiations with Lefkowitz</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>9/17/07
11:33 am</td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail summarizing status of plea negotiations with Lefkowitz</td></tr></table>

EFTA00190102

<table border="1"><tr><td>31</td><td>9/17/0711:43 am</td><td>Acosta</td><td></td><td>E-mail asking to advise Lefkowitz that agreement is draft only.</td></tr><tr><td>32</td><td>9/17/0711:45 am</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail providing most recent draft of Non-Prosecution Agreement(w/Agreement attached)</td></tr><tr><td>33</td><td>9/18/078:44 am</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail summarizing possible agreements, possible federal charges,and confidentiality concerns</td></tr><tr><td>34</td><td>9/18/079:18 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail asking us to consider pleading to one 12-month count with 6 months of community control</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td>9/18/079:31 am</td><td></td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail relating status of negotiations.</td></tr><tr><td>36</td><td>9/18/0710:05 am</td><td></td><td></td><td>E-mail stating new terms that negotiated with Lefkowitz.</td></tr><tr><td>37</td><td>9/18/0711:09 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail containing a proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement with a plea to two violations of 18 USC§1512(d)</td></tr><tr><td>38</td><td>9/18/0711:18 am</td><td></td><td></td><td>E-mail forwarding Lefkowitz&#x27;s proposed agreement with discussion of improper terms</td></tr><tr><td>39</td><td>9/18/0711:43 am</td><td></td><td></td><td>E-mail commenting that Lefkowitz&#x27;s proposed agreement does not contain a promise to register and a promise to pay damages</td></tr><tr><td>40</td><td>9/18/0711:52 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail containing a revised proposed agreement with a plea to only one Information</td></tr><tr><td>41</td><td>9/18/0712:44 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail responding to proposed agreement and noting incorrect calculation of Sentencing Guidelines</td></tr><tr><td>42</td><td>9/18/071:22 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail responding to Lefkowitz&#x27;s question re Guidelines calculation and attaching a proposed plea agreement.</td></tr><tr><td>43</td><td>9/18/072:53 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail addressing the appropriate 1512 charge and providing a draft factual proffer</td></tr><tr><td>44</td><td>9/19/0710:45 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail addressing a joint meeting with defense,USAO,and SAO to finalize all agreements</td></tr><tr><td>45</td><td>9/19/0711:48 am</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail chain discussing facts supporting 1512 charge</td></tr><tr><td>46</td><td>9/19/073:44 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail forwarding a&quot;redline&quot;of the federal plea agreement.Lefkowitz draft contains</td></tr></table>

EFTA00190103

<table border="1"><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>agreements: (a) to waive the PSI, (b) to make a binding sentencing recommendation, (c) to recommend jointly an incorrect Guidelines calculation, (d) to set up a Trust governed by the State court, (e) to have Epstein plead to “coercing a person to become a prostitute,” which is a non-registrable offense, and removes the appeal waiver</td></tr><tr><td>47</td><td>9/19/07 4:05 pm</td><td rowspan="8">Krischer</td><td></td><td>E-mail forwarding Lefkowitz&#x27;s draft and discussing problems with his proposal</td></tr><tr><td>48</td><td>9/20/07 9:31 am</td><td>Belohlavek Krischer</td><td>E-mail chain discussing proposed joint meeting with Epstein&#x27;s counsel to finalize all agreements</td></tr><tr><td>49</td><td>9/20/07 1:56 pm</td><td></td><td>E-mail forwarding federal plea agreement incorporating Acosta and comments</td></tr><tr><td>50</td><td>9/20/07 3:52 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail forwarding final federal plea agreement and Information.</td></tr><tr><td>51</td><td>9/20/07 5:33 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail discussing telephone conference to discuss final changes</td></tr><tr><td>52</td><td>9/20/07 5:33 pm</td><td></td><td>E-mail chain discussing factual proffer in support of federal plea</td></tr><tr><td>53</td><td>9/20/07 5:46 pm</td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail summarizing call with Lefkowitz in response to Lefkowitz call to Acosta</td></tr><tr><td>54</td><td>9/20/07 6:12 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail responding to most recent federal plea agreement with questions re sentence and Section 2255 language</td></tr><tr><td>55</td><td>9/20/07 6:42 pm</td><td rowspan="4">Krischer</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>Response to 6:12 pm e-mail stating that we seem to be far apart on 2255 language and stating that timeline must be shortened</td></tr><tr><td>56</td><td>9/20/07 7:03 pm</td><td></td><td>E-mail stating that Lefkowitz wants to remove registration requirement</td></tr><tr><td>57</td><td>9/20/07 8:35 pm</td><td></td><td>E-mail asking call Lefkowitz and inform him that Epstein must plead to registrable offense</td></tr><tr><td>58</td><td>9/21/07 10:22 am</td><td></td><td>E-mail informing of conversation with Lefkowitz about registration issue</td></tr><tr><td>59</td><td>9/21/07 10:44 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mail containing Lefkowitz&#x27;s “redlined” Non-Prosecution Agreement beginning at paragraph 2. Contains language that Epstein waives his right to contest liability</td></tr><tr><td>60</td><td>9/21/07 10:57 am</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail requesting non-redlined version of agreement</td></tr><tr><td>61</td><td>9/21/07 12:03 pm</td><td>Krischer</td><td>Belohlavek</td><td>E-mail summarizing SAO negotiations with Goldberger, including Goldberger&#x27;s request</td></tr></table>

EFTA00190104

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>that Epstein not have to register</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>62</td><td>9/21/07 2:12 pm</td><td>■</td><td>■</td><td>E-mail containing revised agreement incorporating some of Lefkowitz’s language and highlighting 2255 negotiations</td></tr><tr><td>63</td><td>9/21/07 2:46 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>■</td><td>E-mail attaching State plea agreement, including plea to procuring person under 18 for prostitution</td></tr><tr><td>64</td><td>9/21/07 2:47 pm</td><td>■</td><td>■</td><td>Response to e-mail about Lefkowitz’s proposed language regarding immigration proceedings</td></tr><tr><td>65</td><td>9/21/07 2:55 pm</td><td>■</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail informing Lefkowitz of refusal to include immigration language</td></tr><tr><td>66</td><td>9/21/07 2:54 pm</td><td>■</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail with questions regarding state plea agreement</td></tr><tr><td>67</td><td>9/23/07 11:58 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail admitting that the defense based their agreement to plead to 796.03 on a “mistaken assumption” and requesting that Epstein not have to register</td></tr><tr><td>68</td><td>9/23/07 1:57 pm</td><td>Secretary to Lefkowitz</td><td>■</td><td>E-mail containing another redlined version of agreement</td></tr><tr><td>69</td><td>9/23/07 4:03 pm</td><td>■</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail containing revised Non-Prosecution Agreement</td></tr><tr><td>70</td><td>9/23/07 4:31 pm</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail response to Lefkowitz instructing Lefkowitz to deal directly with and in negotiating agreement</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>9/23/07 8:01 pm</td><td>■</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail correspondence regarding guardian ad litem issue</td></tr><tr><td>72</td><td>9/23/07 8:31 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td rowspan="2">■</td><td>E-mail discussing guardian ad litem issue and providing another redlined version of agreement</td></tr><tr><td>73</td><td>9/23/07 8:35 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail discussing appointment of a trustee in lieu of a guardian ad litem with responses attached, including Lefkowitz’s suggestion that the USAO “consider simply appointing a representative. We would agree to someone you considered appropriate.”</td></tr><tr><td>74</td><td>9/23/07 8:58 pm</td><td>■</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail containing amended Non-Prosecution Agreement incorporating some changes requested by defense</td></tr><tr><td>75</td><td>9/24/07 12:42 am</td><td>Acosta</td><td>■</td><td>E-mail containing Acosta edits to Agreement</td></tr></tbody></table>

EFTA00190105

<table border="1"><tr><td>76</td><td>9/24/07
7:54 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td></td><td>E-mails related to Acosta edits with Agreement attached</td></tr><tr><td>77</td><td>9/24/07
11:46 am</td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>Lefkowitz
Weinberg</td><td>E-mail containing Lefkowitz&#x27;s final edits to agreement</td></tr><tr><td>78</td><td>9/24/07
1:28 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz
Weinberg</td><td>E-mail containing Acosta&#x27;s final edits and asking to discuss potential victim representative</td></tr><tr><td>79</td><td>9/24/07
1:54 pm</td><td></td><td>Acosta
Atkinson</td><td>E-mail containing final agreement as approved by both parties</td></tr><tr><td>80</td><td>9/24/07
4:03 pm</td><td rowspan="2"></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>E-mail requesting signed agreement, with response</td></tr><tr><td>81</td><td>9/24/07
4:26 pm</td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail containing signed agreement</td></tr></table>

# In Re Operation Leap Year Key Correspondence Volume 2 of 2

[Correspondence following Signing of Non-Prosecution Agreement]

INDEX

<table border="1"><tr><td>Tab</td><td>Date&amp;Time</td><td>From</td><td>To</td><td>Description</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>9/24/07</td><td></td><td></td><td>Final Signed Non-Prosecution Agreement</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>9/25/078:37 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail with list of suggested attorney representatives</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>9/26/0711:01 am</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail regarding suggested attorney representatives</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>9/26/0711:49 am</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail rejecting attorney representatives recommended by Lefkowitz</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>9/27/0710:52 am</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail forwarding questions from Ocariz</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>9/27/073:06 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail to Lefkowitz responding to his concerns about Ocariz&#x27;s questions</td></tr></table>

EFTA00190106

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Date</th><th>Time</th><th>Location</th><th>Contact</th><th>Action</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7</td><td>10/3/07<br>3:15 pm</td><td rowspan="8"></td><td rowspan="8"></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail to schedule conference call with memo regarding attorney representative selection process</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>10/3/07<br>3:38 pm</td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail regarding memo</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>10/3/07<br>4:23 pm</td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail attaching proposed text of letter to Special Master</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>10/3/07<br>7:30 pm</td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail responding to Lefkowitz’s concerns about letter to Special Master</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>10/5/07<br>7:49 am</td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail about Special Master process</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>10/5/07<br>11:04 am</td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail attaching letter raising concerns about Special Master process</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>10/5/07<br>4:48 pm</td><td rowspan="3"></td><td rowspan="3"></td><td>E-mail forwarding letter from Lefkowitz re Special Master process</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>10/7/07<br>6:29 pm</td><td>E-mail chain including correspondence between Sanchez and Sanchez</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>10/9/07<br>8:51 am</td><td>E-mail attaching correspondence from Sanchez regarding Special Master Process</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>10/9/07</td><td rowspan="4"></td><td rowspan="4"></td><td>Sanchez</td><td>Letter responding to Sanchez letter</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>10/22/07<br>4:41 pm</td><td>Lefkowitz Acosta</td><td>E-mail to Lefkowitz attaching proposed Addendum and letter to Judge Davis</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>10/22/07<br>5:10 pm</td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail addressing Special Master issues</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>10/22/07<br>5:23 pm</td><td rowspan="2">Lefk</td><td rowspan="2">Acosta</td><td>E-mail responding to issue of using Judge Davis as attorney representative</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>10/23/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter to Acosta stating that Epstein will enter his guilty plea on November 20, 2007; addressing attorney representative issues; stating that Office will not communicate with State Atty&#x27;s Office</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>10/23/07<br>9:40 pm</td><td rowspan="5"></td><td rowspan="5"></td><td>Acosta</td><td>Response to Lefkowitz&#x27;s letter noting specific misrepresentation</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>10/24/07<br>3:45 pm</td><td>Lefk Acosta</td><td>E-mail attaching revised addendum and letter to Special Master</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td>10/24/07<br>5:30 pm</td><td>Lefk Acosta</td><td>E-mail attaching revised letter to Judge Davis</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>10/25/07</td><td>Davis</td><td>Letter advising Judge Davis of his selection as Special Master</td></tr></tbody></table>

EFTA00190107

<table><thead><tr><th>25</th><td>10/30/07 9:56 am</td><td></td><td></td><td>E-mail attaching final addendum</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>26</td><td>10/30/07</td><td></td><td></td><td>Final executed Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement</td></tr><tr><td>27</td><td>10/31/07 11:51 am</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>E-mail response to Lefkowitz&#39;s inquiry regarding “discovery” in the civil case</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td>11/5/07</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>Letter addressing problems with Epstein&#39;s performance [NEED SIGNED COPY]</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td>11/8/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td></td><td>Letter stating that Epstein intends to comply and raising 2255 concerns</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>11/27/07 1:55 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefk Acosta</td><td>E-mail responding to Lefkowitz&#39;s statement in his letter that he needs to conduct “due diligence” on selection of Podhurst firm</td></tr><tr><td>31</td><td>11/28/07</td><td>Starr</td><td>Fisher</td><td>Letter requesting meeting with Fisher</td></tr><tr><td>32</td><td>11/28/07 4:35 pm</td><td></td><td></td><td>E-mail asking to send proposed victim notification letter to Lefkowitz in response to Lefkowitz&#39;s complaints about notifying victims</td></tr><tr><td>33</td><td>11/28/07 4:47 pm</td><td></td><td>Lefk Acosta</td><td>E-mail attaching proposed victim notification letter</td></tr><tr><td>34</td><td>11/29/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter responding to e-mail containing the victim notification letter.</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td>11/30/07</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Letter directing Lefk to speak with and about victim notification issues and informing defense of willingness to unwind the agreement</td></tr><tr><td>36</td><td>12/4/07</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Starr</td><td>Letter responding to Starr&#39;s complaints to Fisher regarding the 2255 issues and detailing the negotiations of the agreement</td></tr><tr><td>37</td><td>12/5/07</td><td>Starr Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter “reaffirming the Non-Prosecution Agreement” but reiterating challenges to 2255 and the office&#39;s investigation</td></tr><tr><td>38</td><td>12/6/07</td><td></td><td>Lefkowitz</td><td>Letter responding to victim notification objections and attaching revised victim notification letter</td></tr><tr><td>39</td><td>12/7/07</td><td>Sanchez</td><td>Acosta Starr</td><td>Letter containing signed Affirmation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum and requesting a delay in sending victim notification letters</td></tr><tr><td>40</td><td>12/7/07</td><td>Starr Lefk</td><td>Acosta Fisher</td><td>Letter stating the defense will respond to Acosta letter by 12/10/07, and attaching “the independent ethics opinions of Judge Herbert J. Stern and Joe D. Whitley”</td></tr></tbody></table>



EFTA00190108

<table border="1"><tr><td>41</td><td>12/11/07</td><td>Starr</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Cover letter to introduce two separate letters addressing policy concerns</td></tr><tr><td>42</td><td>12/11/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter attacking evidence upon which prosecution was based (contains same challenges raised in earlier submission) requesting “fulsome review” of the evidence, and attacking “improper involvement and conduct of federal authorities”</td></tr><tr><td>43</td><td>12/11/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter addressing 2255 concerns</td></tr><tr><td>44</td><td>12/13/07</td><td></td><td>Lefk</td><td>Letter responding to alleged improprieties</td></tr><tr><td>45</td><td>12/17/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>E-mail responding to inquiry from 12/14/07 meeting about why defense had waited so long to go to DC</td></tr><tr><td>46</td><td>12/17/07</td><td>Starr Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>110-page letter addressing inapplicability of procurement statute to Epstein&#x27;s conduct, State Attorney&#x27;s Office&#x27;s belief that Epstein should not have to register, inapplicability of 18 USC § 2422 to Epstein&#x27;s conduct; and reiteration of 2255 concerns.
Attachment: 7/6/07 Lefcourt letter with attachments</td></tr><tr><td>47</td><td>12/19/07</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Sanchez</td><td>Letter responding to issues raised at December 14th meeting, including 2255, victim notification, and asserted inapplicability of Fl. Stat. 796.03</td></tr><tr><td>48</td><td>12/21/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter responding to 12/19/07 Acosta letter regarding 2255, victim notification, and Fl. Stat. 796.03</td></tr><tr><td>49</td><td>12/26/07</td><td>Lefk</td><td>Acosta</td><td>Letter stating that there should be no notification to victims and stating that there is no language that they can propose to resolve the 2255 problem</td></tr></table>

EFTA00190109