EFTA00180093

## Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

<table border="1"><tr><td>From:</td><td>Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS)</td></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Wednesday，July 09，2008 3:24 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Lee，Dexter(USAFLS)</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>RE：Revised Draft with DOJ Edits</td></tr></table>

I added 18 usc 3509(d)(2). It says we don't even need to file a motion, but better safe than sorry.

A. Marie Villafaña

Assistant U.S. Attorney

561 209-1047

<table><thead><tr><th>From:</th><td>Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:10 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>RE: Revised Draft with DOJ Edits</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Marie,

Yes, we are ready to file. As far as statutory authority, we can cite the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, et. Seq. Also, are there any special victim-witness provisions regarding restrictions on disclosure of victims' names and personal identifying information?

Dexter

<table><thead><tr><th>From:</th><td>Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:06 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>RE: Revised Draft with DOJ Edits</td></tr></tbody></table>

Hi Dexter – Does this mean your response is good to go? On the sealed document tracking form, is there a particular statute or rule that you think gives us the right to file under seal? Thank you.

A. Marie Villafaña

Assistant U.S. Attorney

561 209-1047

<table border="1"><tr><td>From:</td><td>Lee, Dexter(USAFLS)</td></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Wednesday，July09，20083:04PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Herd，Kim(USAEO)；Villafana，Ann Marie C.(USAFLS)；Acosta，Alex(USAFLS)；Sloman，Jeff(USAFLS)</td></tr><tr><td>Cc:</td><td>Jacobus，Wendy(USAFLS)；Rothenberg，Laurence E(SMO)；Wood，Seth M(SMO)；Neal，Kristina(USAEO)；Manning，Katharine(USAEO)</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>RE：Revised Draft with DOJ Edits</td></tr></table>

Subject: RE: Revised Draft with DOJ Edits

Kim,

565