Michael,

Received, thank you. This information is helpful, and as with the prior attorney proffer, does not cause us to change our view of status.

We will be traveling most of this upcoming week, but I hope that we will be able to follow up with you the following week to discuss possible next steps.

thank you,

From: Michael Bachner

**Sent:** Friday, February 21, 2020 10:45

ols see attached replies to your questions.

From: Michael Bachner

**Sent:** Tuesday, February 18, 2020 12:01

Subject: RE: Attorney Proffer

Good morning. was away over the weekend. I expect to have a reply to your questions by tomorrow.



Got it -- I had that down as London, rather than Paris, so that's helpful. And I should say, these questions aren't immediately time-sensitive, I just didn't want to forget to ask, since I'm reviewing the notes now.

thanks,

From: Michael Bachner

**Sent:** Saturday, February 15, 2020 15:41

| EFTA00090587 |
| :--- | :---

Hi A is away for the weekend. In our meeting I indicated that she stayed in the Paris apartment with her husband on one occasion. I will get back to you on Monday or Tuesday regarding the other questions you’ve asked today as well as at the meeting. Have a nice weekend



Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation.

## https://www.actl.com/



NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice.

On Feb 15, 2020, at 3:05 PM,



> wrote:



Michael,

Following up on our meeting, one additional question / clarification we have from reviewing our notes is about whether Ms. ever visited certain Epstein properties other than his New York mansion and the brief visit to the Palm Beach residence. I apologize if you addressed that and I missed it, but we wanted to add it to the list of additional questions – in particular, whether she ever visited the New Mexico ranch, the Little St. James Island, the Great St. James island, and/or the Paris residence. Also, is it correct that she just visited the Palm Beach residence the one time you referenced? It’s not a problem or issue if she visited any of those other locations, we just wanted to clarify one way or the other. And happy to discuss via phone if that’s useful.

thank you,



**Sent:** Thursday, February 13, 2020 13:40



To: Michael Bachner