Subject: RE: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH



Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:28:11 +0000





Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg



Sure, will do, thanks.



Subject: RE: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH

That does sound familiar, thanks for reminding me. Would you mind drafting a short email to on this? Happy to look at a draft if it would be helpful.



Subject: RE: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH

We had to get Geoff’s approval for the friendly subpoena to the plaintiffs’ attorney in Hadden, which is why I thought we would need approval for this.

The relevant USAM provision is 9-13.410(D)(1):

Friendly Subpoenas for Client-Related Information. The United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General responsible for a matter may authorize the issuance of a “friendly subpoena” for client-related information, that is, in a situation in which an attorney witness expressly agrees in writing (including by email) to provide the information, but requests the formality of a subpoena. Before issuing any such subpoena, the responsible United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General must evaluate the request consistent with subsection C of this policy. If the friendly subpoena seeks testimony, information, or materials identified in Items (D)(2)(a)-(h) below, the federal prosecutor handling the case may authorize the issuance of the subpoena.



Subject: RE: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH

Check the USAM, I don’t recall, but I don’t think so.



Subject: RE: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH

EFTA00086991

Thanks. If we went the subpoena route, would the subpoena require U.S. Attorney approval?



Subject: RE: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH

Aren’t we continuing to look at her finances as relevant to, among other things, her ongoing ties to Epstein and/or any efforts he may have made to buy her silence? Particularly given that we already have some reason to believe (based on what I recall of our detention memo) that money from Epstein may have been used to finance the purchase of the property, I would think we have a good faith basis to believe these records might be relevant to the grand jury’s ongoing examination of the conduct already in and surrounding the charged case, especially since we are continuing to investigate/conduct new interviews/review new materials, and we don’t have a trial date. But happy to discuss further.



Our case agent has heard from the attorney who represented Maxwell (or rather, Granite Realty) in the NH real estate closing. She has volunteered to disclose her file, but asked for a subpoena. We would like to get more information about this, but issuing a grand jury subpoena seems potentially problematic, as it is not immediately clear to us that these records relate to any prospective superseder, and we don’t have a trial date for a trial subpoena. (Although these would be attorney subpoenas, since they are “friendly” subpoenas, my understanding is that PSEU approval is not required).

We wanted to check with you to see if you think we should proceed another way, or if we should just ask our case agent to interview her and see what she is willing to share, or if we should just leave this alone.

Thanks,



Subject: FW: 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH

Hey all,

FYI...see below. The attorney who handled the purchase closing for 338 E. Washington Road, Bradford, NH. I spoke with her on the phone and she is willing to speak further after going through the proper channels.



From

**Sent:** Monday, July 6, 2020 12:04 PM