## Any update on this Julio? | From: | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation) | | rk for me. I will get back with u soon. | | | | wrote:
On Jun 12, 2019 3:09 PM | | who was amenable to sending them the files directly.
Just to clarify, SDNY was working wi | | FroM
Sent: Wednesday. June 12 7019 11:54 AM | | Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation) | | give me a call when you have a chance. Thanks | | | | | | | | From
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2019 4:11 PM | | | | Subject: FW: records management (Epstein investigation) | | Illi
re you are familiar with the Epstein case, we recently received the case file from MM. The USAO SDNY is | requesting the case file be sent to a third party vendor so the documents can be scanned. Apparently this has been | done numerous times in the past with other FBI files (see below). With a file this size I think their request makes sense
as they want to have the file in a digital format for scanning, cataloguing, and indexing purposes. Does Miami have any
objection to us releasing the file in its entirety so SDNY can utilized a vetted third party vendor to scan the files? I have
so she can weigh in on the discussion. I would like to have your concurrence before
cc'd the NY0 CD
releasing the files since they belong to MM.
Thanks,
Sean | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | Subject: RE: records management (Epstein investigation) | | Thanks very much again for talking with us earlier, and we wanted to get you the example cases as promised—it's a
number of cases so hopefully that's helpful. I think the ideal would be for the materials to come directly to us so our
paralegals can manage the process with the vendor (unless the documents are already on their way to the New York
field office), and then we can send them either to you or back to Florida once they've been scanned. | | The following investigations have been with our office and FBI where we've used outside vendors, including for original
and highly sensitive documents (such as medical records, personnel records, etc.): | | U.S. v. Chambe
U.S. V. Adelglas
U.S. V. Ng Lap | Please do let us know if any other info would be helpful, and we're also happy to chat with anybody who wants to talk with us about it, and hopefully we can finalize this week. In terms of the vendor, we choose from a small number of organizations that work with us regularly, and they keep all the information strictly confidential (by contractual requirement, most importantly, though also from a desire to be able to continue to get work with us). I'm not aware of any instances where that has been a problem. thanks again, U.S. V. Tortora, U.S. V. Ashraf U.S. V. Goldbre U.S. v. Vargas, U.S. V. Krupkin, U.S. v. Cruz, ov