Subject: RE: Revised MILs and letters Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:36:02 +0000

OK will do.

From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, October 18, 20214:35 PM To: (USANYS) A Subject: RE: Revised MILs and letters >

Go ahead — I'm not in them. I didn't have comments. And agree with the below.

From: (USANYS) < Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 4:34 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Revised MILs and letters

Here are a few comments on the motion. I looked at the two letters also, and have one suggestion on each (I'm happy to propose language in redline, but you may be in the dots)

- 1. On the "key" letter would it be possible to include a sentence on pointing to Judge Nathan to whatever the article(s) in which she has made comments about Epstein that are far more limited than what she will say in court?
- 2. On the sealing letter I think we should add a sentence explaining why we think the claim of Maxwell abuse will cause prejudicial publicity. Namely, to air that issue in a public filing when there may well be no good faith basis for it would potentially taint the jury pool.

| From:                             |                                        |    |            |  |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|----|------------|--|
|                                   | Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 3:46 PM |    |            |  |
| To:                               | (USANYS)                               | >; | (USANYS)   |  |
| Cc:                               | ) C a                                  | s; | (USANYS) < |  |
| Subject: Revised MILs and letters |                                        |    |            |  |

Hi and

Attached for your review are:

- 1. Revised MILs
- 2. A redline
- 3. A draft cover letter
- 4. A draft index letter with victim information

Thanks!

Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York

New York, New York 10007