DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 1 (EFTA00000473)

vould then be asking for a TOTAL decliation. ( if he talks starter but does he want to send you a proed set of facts, to which we w allee that emotions are running high on both of our sides. But if You take a step ba ek which I a strongly urge you to do. I think you’ll agree that our current propo ultimately want , nor what you would have preferred- is cur tly the best overall so us. I think it is fair and just. Id like you to think about it, and I sugge g date until tomorrow , after you have had ar circumstances and reconsider , the po sibility of getting this, con

rdays call. I wanted to give you Ii Alex, I wanted to have a one on one conversation Alex, I wanted to have a one conversable the New Your ward the Norw in Nore you now comfirm for yourself what Lily had representad regarding the Namely third party hearty hea that contrary to the tave proof positive di what craincies of what party bart party bart party bart party bart party bart party bart party both collects cheracter and class c e of a breach of th igh flacts that w and h irrest), after repeatedly voicing the offices concern with the Palm beach post editor + 1591 the theory of the case , and talked abo ut the multiple charging statues , e the theory of the matficking - that is patently unfair to Mr. E . Frankly , as you heard yr both , to put it mildly, is outraged . He is a man of great faithin the system of justice. He has two bibles, the king and the us believes in the system, and in this case he belie es it has fail Seniors review , is merely designed to be a rubber sta a for the office. Reg Seniors review , taken a highly principled position. Yest put it , your thought process. You looked at the ca And said . wh uld have registration, we would has conviction. We w to sue under 2255. I recognize that would be y Had you had the statutes that were clearly in the he en caught in the n , had Epstein be questions. Ho ever, the ne process , have dramatically changed that la At th re of Maries misrepresentations. , you were unaw unaware of the wildly exaggerated list of victims. bling brea certainly unaware of the most from certainly unaware of the aside , BASED ON THE NEW FACTS AND THE LAW WW viously brought .. there are none that of this isn’t th case pr case previously tinl decision needs to be revisited WE d stretch .- the initial decision needs minent aggearance a policy actually applies, and its prominent ap rance and than di ould encourage you however to ser cly res would enclisition in strongly urge you to accept it . You ure to all outstanding and extremely problematic an not sent you a letter as I ’d prefer not to begin t tious argument. . That being id , I fully reof conte of contems of constituents -The FBI They could be ass that worked on this case. still willing to accept. - The victin uct is state conduct, y principled,and fair. The coprincipled,o fit. I fear that , if this is not it d quickly, U n’t th nk that v w us into a tornado of tro ble. A will der IF Alan Dershowitz, ar { I think this is a middle groun antic

Jeffrey E. Epstein

EFTA00000473