# United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Related Case Statement
## Full Caption of Later Filed Case:
OPERATING ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND MISCELLANEOUS PENSION FUND, derivatively on behalf of JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
Plaintiff VS. JAMES DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LINDA B. BAMMANN, JAMES A. cHN H. BIGGS. CRANDALL C. BOVVLES. STEPHEN B. . TODD A. COMBS. DAVID M. COTE. JAMES S. CROWN. MARY C. ERDOES. TIMOTHY P. FLYNN. ELLEN VS TER, MELLODY HOBSON. JOHN J. HOGAN. LABAN P. a JR.. JOHN W. KESSLER. ROBERT I. LIPP. RICHARD A. MANOOGIAN. MICHAEL A. NEAL. DAVID C. NOVAK. LEE R. RAYMOND. JAMES E. STALEY. WILLIAM C. WELDON. and BARRY L. ZUBROW.
Case Number
1:23-cv-03903
# Full Caption of Earlier Filed Case-
(including in bankruptcy appeals the relevant adversary proceeding)
JANE DOE 1, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff VS. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Case Number
22-cv-10019 (JSR)
## Status of Earlier Filed Case:
• (If so, set forth the procedure which resulted in closure, e.g., voluntary Closed dismissal, settlement, court decision. Also, state whether there is an appeal pending.)
Open (If so, set forth procedural status and summarize any court rulings.)
On May 1, 2023, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part JP motion to dismiss Doe's First Amended Complaint (Docket #130). The parties are proceeding with certain fact discovery, including the service of document subpoenas and certain depositions scheduled for May 2023.
Explain in detail the reasons for your position that the newly filed case is related to the earlier filed case.
The newly-filed litigation and earlier-filed litigation arise from mmon nucleus of ooerative fact related to Epstein's longstanding history as a client of JP , and JP concealment and/or failure to report Epstein's suspicious banking practices to regulators. The earlier-filed litigation asserts that JP facilitated, concealed, and/or enabled Epstein's abuse of dozens of victims, in violation of New York and federal law. The newlyfiled litigation seeks to hold the board of directors liable for breaching their fiduciary duties by failing to properly oversee JP relationship with Epstein and JP compliance with applicable banking laws and regulations, and thereby allowing JP misconduct related to Epstein to occur.
Signature:
Firm:
s/ Rebecca Musarra Date: 05/09/2023
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
# United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Related Case Statement
## Full Caption of Later Filed Case:
OPERATING ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND MISCELLANEOUS PENSION FUND, derivatively on behalf of JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
| vs. | 1:23-cv-03903 |
| JAMES DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LINDA B. BAMMANN, JAMES A. BELL, JOHN H. BIGGS, CRANDALL C. BOWLES, STEPHEN B. [REDACTED], TODD A. COMBS, DAVID M. COTE, JAMES S. CROWN, MARY C. ERDOES, TIMOTHY P. FLYNN, ELLEN V. FLUTTER, MELLODY HOBSON, JOHN J. HOGAN, LABAN P. [REDACTED], JR., JOHN W. KESSLER, ROBERT I. LIPP, RICHARD A. MANOOGIAN, MICHAEL A. NEAL, DAVID C. NOVAK, LEE R. RAYMOND, JAMES E. STALEY, WILLIAM C. WELDON, and BARRY L. ZUBROW,
| |
### Full Caption of Earlier Filed Case.
(including in bankruptcy appeals the relevant adversary proceeding)
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS,
| | |
| ---------------------------- | ------------------- |
| vs. | 22-cv-10904 (JSR) |
| JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., | |
## Status of Earlier Filed Case:
• (If so, set forth the procedure which resulted in closure, e.g., voluntary Closed dismissal, settlement, court decision. Also, state whether there is an appeal pending.)
Open (If so, set forth procedural status and summarize any court rulings.)
On May 8, 2023, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part JP motion to dismiss the U.S. Virgin Islands' Second Amended Complaint (Docket #135). The parties are proceeding with certain tact discovery, including the service of document subpoenas and certain depositions scheduled for May 2023.
Explain in detail the reasons for your position that the newly filed case is related to the earlier filed case.
The newly-filed litigation and earlier-filed litigation arise from a commmius of operative fact related to Jeffrey Epstein's longstanding history as a client of JP , and JP concealment of and/or failure to report Epstein's suspicious banking practices to regulators. The earlier-filed litigation asserts that JP facilitated, concealed, and/or enabled Epstein's abuse of Doe 1 and other victims. The newly-filed litigation seeks to hold the board of director f P liable for breaching their fid • ties by failing to properly oversee JP relationship with Epstein and JP compliance with applicable banking laws and regulations, and thereby allowing JP misconduct related to Epstein to occur.
Signature: s/ Rebecca Musarra Date: 05/09/2023 Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Firm: